<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: update 11/7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zachstocks.com/2007/11/update-117/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zachstocks.com/2007/11/update-117/</link>
	<description>Dynamic Investments for Exceptional Traders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:25:18 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://zachstocks.com/2007/11/update-117/comment-page-1/#comment-1737</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 00:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zachstocks.com/2007/11/update-117/#comment-1737</guid>
		<description>First off, thanks for everything on this site.  You provide great insight and information.  My question pertains to PWRD.  Why the massive sell off after more than doubling analyst expectations?  I realize the market was down as a whole, tech was crushed, and China was hammered, but you&#039;d think at worst PWRD would tread water after such great earnings release.  What gives?  TheStreet.com is saying it was due to confusing guidance.  I can accomodate that idea as possible, however feel it is unlikely.  (The language in the release was akward...They mentioned that they were projecting Q4 to be on par or slightly under this quarters earnings.  Which, when compared to initial estimates is actually a RAISE of expectations.  

Thoughts?  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, thanks for everything on this site.  You provide great insight and information.  My question pertains to PWRD.  Why the massive sell off after more than doubling analyst expectations?  I realize the market was down as a whole, tech was crushed, and China was hammered, but you&#8217;d think at worst PWRD would tread water after such great earnings release.  What gives?  TheStreet.com is saying it was due to confusing guidance.  I can accomodate that idea as possible, however feel it is unlikely.  (The language in the release was akward&#8230;They mentioned that they were projecting Q4 to be on par or slightly under this quarters earnings.  Which, when compared to initial estimates is actually a RAISE of expectations.  </p>
<p>Thoughts?  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: contrary canary</title>
		<link>http://zachstocks.com/2007/11/update-117/comment-page-1/#comment-1731</link>
		<dc:creator>contrary canary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 19:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zachstocks.com/2007/11/update-117/#comment-1731</guid>
		<description>Seems like the problem with those solar plays is entry; I just don&#039;t want to be late to the party and left holding the bag.  

How about that Falcons Panthers game -  I&#039;m thinking I have to take the 4 points given the Falcons to win or lose by a field goal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like the problem with those solar plays is entry; I just don&#8217;t want to be late to the party and left holding the bag.  </p>
<p>How about that Falcons Panthers game &#8211;  I&#8217;m thinking I have to take the 4 points given the Falcons to win or lose by a field goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://zachstocks.com/2007/11/update-117/comment-page-1/#comment-1690</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 01:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zachstocks.com/2007/11/update-117/#comment-1690</guid>
		<description>LULU is too risky for me at this point. The stock has too much downside risk I think for this type of market. The first time that thing disappoints one bit wall street will give it a bigtime haircut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LULU is too risky for me at this point. The stock has too much downside risk I think for this type of market. The first time that thing disappoints one bit wall street will give it a bigtime haircut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
