Last week Petrohawk Energy Corporation (HK) posted earnings for the third quarter. Once again, the company came through with flying colors as production was up 37% and operating expenses hit a new low at just 43 cents per Mcfe. When adding overhead costs the total cost to produce gas was $1.34 per Mcfe compared to average realization prices (what the company was able to sell the gas for) of $9.68 for the quarter. This represents a strong multiple and allows management the flexibility to operate profitably even during periods of lower natural gas prices.
The company also updated its forward guidance for production as estimated 2009 production will average 366 Mmcfe per day. This compares very favorably to current production for the first three quarters below 300 Mmcfe per day. In order to fund the necessary drilling to meet these production goals, the company is guiding for capital expenditures near $1.0 billion. Capital expenditures can be challenging in this day and age with liquidity virtually unavailable, but the company is currently sitting on $258 million in cash and is expecting roughly $620 million in free cash flow. This leaves a funding gap of about $380 million which should be easily covered by the company’s $1.1 billion of untapped resources in a revolving credit line.
Management is committed to investing wisely toward profitable drilling, but also commits to a disciplined approach. The ability to accelerate or decelerate its programs based on the price of commodities is listed as one of managements most important tools. This means that if prices fall too far, management will cut back on expenditures and maintain a healthy balance sheet. Once prices recover, the production initiatives can pick back up to take advantage of higher revenue levels per Mcf. 
One of the most important factors for any Oil or Natural Gas producer is the price they receive for the commodity they sell. Up to this point, the company has had portions of their production with relatively limited choices as to who to sell to. Since natural gas is still not considered an easily transported fuel, the company sometimes had to accept local market prices that may have been below the published NYMEX price for the particular period. However, at the end of December, a new gathering and distribution pipeline will come online which vastly improve the ability to sell to a wider marketplace. This should increase the average price received per unit of gas or oil and add to the company’s revenues and profits.
As far as hedging production is concerned, the company has the majority of production boxed with a floor and a cap which provides stability while still allowing for strong gains if natural gas prices rise rapidly. At this point it appears that 78% of 2009 production is protected with a floor of $7.95 and 66% of the production is capped with a ceiling at $11.77. Barclays estimates that with gas at $7.50 per mcf that the net asset value of the company including all the untapped reserves is roughly $41 per share.
Reaction to the earnings announcement was relatively positive with the stock closing flat on an ugly day for the market. At this point the stock has run into resistance just below $20 but any strength in the overall economic period could drive oil and gas prices higher and consequently HK’s stock price.
HK Notes
FD: Author does not have a position in HK
Additional Reading:
Minyanville: Is Obama Good for Natural Gas?
Anthony Mirhaydari: McCain Win Would Have Been Good For These Stocks
Tenant Screen







November 14th, 2008 at 4:00 am
Petrohawk has done well in the past month, likely on their cost of production benefits. Newfield Exploration (NFX) looks to have lagged but I like their balance sheet. What’s your take on the trend of natgas?
November 14th, 2008 at 12:23 pm
I think natural gas is likely to see a sharp increase over the next 6 months. The new administration has made it clear that green initiatives will be a key factor. Natural gas is still a fossil fuel, but it is the cleanest burning of the category.
With a strong push towards electric vehicles, demand for electricity will be higher and at this time power plants are likely to burn natural gas to meet that demand. Keep in mind coal will likely be the “bad guy” when it comes to power generation.
Also, technological developments making natural gas transportation easier could also fuel an increase in long-term demand.
Thanks for the comment!
Zach